Tradition preserves many teachings, and among these, it is remembered that even up to seven generations are spoken of in the ancient lore. Even in such cases, where activities and rituals are performed, there is no contradiction with the established principles, for the actions themselves account for the distinctions. Yet, when it comes to the relationship between knowledge and action—since this is the topic under discussion—special considerations arise. In a third scenario, however, the same does not apply, for such an occurrence is not observed in practice. This too is remembered by people in the world, and it is confirmed by what is seen in daily life. When a restriction is made by the mention of a third term, it applies specifically to those things that arise from the process of drying up, such as certain ritual substances. It is reasonable to accept that some occurrences are natural to their context. However, they do not persist for a long time, as there are distinctions that arise and cause change. When something is established in another—just as it was previously—the customary usage supports this understanding. If an objection is raised that such a thing is impure, it is not so, for the scriptural word itself does not support that view. Then, the connection with semen is considered, and the origin of the body from the womb is acknowledged. Creation itself is said to take place in an intermediate state, neither wholly manifest nor entirely unmanifest. Some hold that the creator, along with sons and others, are involved in this process. However, the reality is that this creation is only an illusion, for its true nature does not fully reveal itself. Instead, it is concealed by the will of another, and from this concealment arise both bondage and liberation. Alternatively, it may be said that this is due to the connection with the body, and this too is supported by scriptural indication, as declared by those who possess true knowledge. The absence of such qualities is found in the subtle channels and ultimately in the self itself, as affirmed by scripture. Therefore, awakening arises from this very understanding. Despite differences, the essential nature remains the same, because karma, memory, and scriptural injunctions all point to a common ground. For one who is deluded, attainment is only partial, since something always remains unfulfilled. Even by considering location, the distinguishing marks of one do not apply to the other, for such marks are found universally. If one argues that this is due to inherent difference, that is not so, for scripture does not specify such a distinction in every case. Moreover, some uphold this view as well. Indeed, it is like the formless, because that aspect predominates. It is compared to illumination, for otherwise, its existence would serve no purpose. The scriptures declare it to be merely that—pure illumination. This is demonstrated, and moreover, tradition remembers it in this way. Thus, the comparison is drawn: just as the sun and its rays are distinct yet inseparable, so is this relationship. However, the analogy is not exact, for, unlike the sun and its rays, water is not drawn from the rays themselves. Both increase and decrease are included in this teaching, and harmony between the two is observed in the world. The subject is thus limited to this extent, for the scriptures deny further speculation and then proceed to declare additional truths. Ultimately, it is said to be unmanifest. Even when propitiation is performed, its presence is evident through both perception and inference. It remains undifferentiated, like illumination and similar phenomena; and this illumination is repeated in various actions. Therefore, it is infinite, for such is the indication given by the wise. Finally, both aspects are spoken of together, as in the example of the snake and its coil—distinct, yet ultimately one and the same.